Warfare among tribal societies other topics surrounding warfare, Research Paper

state of war among tribal societies other topics surrounding warfare, conflict, or aggression - Research Paper ExampleDiscussion tribal Societies A tribe may be defined as a group of single(a)s in a barbarous or primitive developmental stage, claiming to have a common ancestor, and pledging their allegiance to a chief. A tribe may also be defined as a social group of individuals get together in dialect, having affiliation to a territory, endogamous without specializing in functions, appreciating distance with other tribes and ruled by tribal chiefs (Harrow, 2005). A tribal nightspot on the other hand may be defined as a substance of life in such a way that individuals pursue their own activities as independent local communities. These communities are composed of clan and families without states or central governments. Members of tribal societies are think by their districts, to their neighbors according to Harrow, (2005). Smaller groups of tribal societies have their specific customs, local communities and languages and sometimes engage in conflicts with each other. It is for this very reason that anthropologists claim that such societies are not capable of defending themselves from extraneous forces. Majority of the tribal societies know how to deal with their environments and they have ensured their survival through organizing themselves along the lines of kinship and clans. The way the tribal society views and utilizes the environment is entirely based on the strong cultural ethos held by this tribal society (Rose, 2000). These tribal societies are prone to the pressure of nature. However, the pressure is minimized through the gradationation of clan systems. A clan is described as a group of family responsible for some of the aspects of the tribal life. inscription is offered to each of the tribe by the clan and the clan is responsible for some of the functions in the economy, society and religion. This display case of diffused responsibility offe rs a broad-based insurance policy that ensures the survival of the tribe (Champagne, 1999). Cultures that are organized as large states have numerous cultural concerns such as the emphasis on own(prenominal) mobility, personal safety, personal exemption, individual effort and the material well-being (Rose, 2000). Chronic disputes are very common in most of the tribal societies but these disputes are usually directed externally. The normal survival of a tribal society was not very much threatened by internal conflict although within these smooth societies there was no clear definition between internal and external conflicts. These tribal societies lacked government and their form of rule was anarchic. They were also characterized by economic self sufficiency and self rule or freedom (Bodley, 2007). Internal order was well maintained although they lacked formal legal codes, formal political offices, and specialized law enforcement institutions. The maintenance of order by the triba l society is attributed to the cultural and social conditions. In the tribal societies, the individual self interests do not conflict with the interests of the entire society. Theft, excessive conflict, hoarding of resources and the use of force in the tribal society was detrimental and lacked logic because everyone depended on each others cooperation and mutual trust. Other than stability and ecologic success, the interests of the tribal societies have as maintained the population equilibrium. Conflicts in a low-density tribal society were minimized by extreme flexibility of the group